You could earn SmartPoints on this page!SmartPoint Coin

April 23, 2012 at 3:19 PMComments: 4 Faves: 0

For You, Mr. Roger Ebert

By E.M. Wollof from SLN More Blogs by This Author

On April 16th, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Roger Ebert posted a blog entry entitled, "Video games can never be art." Throughout the blog entry, Ebert dissects video games, and his reasons for why they can never be art, in his usual fashion. He structures his argument against a TED talk given by Kellee Santiago in 2009, using many of her business based arguments as jumping off points for his own thoughts. Give it a read to gain some context, or not, the choice is yours.

On March 16th, 2012, the Smithsonian opened their "The Art of Video Games" exhibit, fully equipped with a few jabs at the film critic (the game "Flower" is included, a game that Ebert referred to as never having crossed the boundary into artistic expression). For many, the Smithsonian exhibit is the culmination/justification of/for years of arguing that their favorite hobby is an art form.

In this gamers opinion, both forms of argument are part of a larger problem, one that may never be solved.

What it is...ac3

The World English Dictionary defines art as "the creation of works of beauty or other special significance." Does this seem like complete and utter poppy-cock to anyone else? Art is like love, indefinable. There is no one person, organization, or deity that can point to the work of another person and universally define that work as art. We historically define the works of past brilliant minds as art because they gathered popularity over a period of time, not because the first person to look at the product declared it was art and it was known hence forth as such.

The very definition of art is a misnomer. It implies that art be viewed as an appeal to aesthetic human interests, though one rarely makes a final judgement based on such interests. Yes, aesthetic qualities lay the base for claims of art, but they do nothing more. True art has never been about what you see, hear, touch, taste, or smell, but about the emotional response to these stimuli. True art rips through your mind, causing you to reevaluate what you believe. True art changes the way you view the world. True art changes you.

me2What I see...

When I begin to question whether or not    video games are a form of art, I look not at  the tireless developers who pour everything they have into these games, I look not at the producers who sell, I look not at the gamers who play, I look not at the generational and socio-economical biases piled against the platform...I look inward. I look at the disappointment I have felt, the joy, the actual tears I shed expressing both. I see that video games are no longer just a hobby to me, but an integral part of my being, much like music. I see them as a shared experience with the love of my life. I see them as my golden ticket into a community that has shaped who I am today. I see them as art.

For you...skyrim

So, Mr. Ebert, when I hear you say, "Video games can never be art," I weep, not because you are a critic with reach, but because you may never be privy to the experience you so easily cast aside. As a critic, you take what many people spend years creating and boil it into a TV show, blog, a simple hand gesture, or rant, forging your own path to what I am sure you have admitted more than once, is art. Critics are the parasites of the creative world and you number among the elite.

I leave you with the thoughts of an artist whose work has forever etched itself upon my mind, Ralph Waldo Emerson:

"A painter told me that nobody could draw a tree without in some sort becoming a tree; or draw a child by studying the outlines of its form merely...but by watching for a time his motion and plays, the painter enters into his nature and can them draw him at every attitude."

I say to all who doubt, come enter the nature of gaming, discover what you may have missed with your cursory glances.

More from E.M. Wollof from SLN Others Are Reading


  • "Critics are the parasites of the creative world." Love what you wrote right there! Very eloquently worded, E.M. and so very true. Also, anything can be art. arts for art sake. no one can ever define what art is in my opinion because it is many things.

  • It is always easy to point at a growing form of expression and scoff at it, never truly grasping at an one does this better than an antiquated critic. You are right, art is many things, it is all things, and it is nothing.

  • I don't see how they can say it's not. Story telling is a form of art as shown by Hollywood. Gaming is story telling in greater depth. I have a choice in the direction the story is told. My actions help me reveal or alter the story. I think that is much more personal and a much stronger form of art than being taken along for a ride.

    visually a painting offers me very little. It's a silent window with one view unchanging. A virtual landscape is a world I can roam free and see it how I want. From a visual perspective its much more difficult to create a 3D realm than a 2D oil on canvas. There is a reason these landscapes are drawn in 2D before going to 3D.

    Last but most certainly not least are the scores. I mean people buy more video game scores than film scores unless it has Hans Zimmer's name on it. Last time I checked beautiful compositions are certainly an art form and bad music can kill an A+++ game.

    This critic is completely blind in his words. If anything Video games are the most complete form of art. They bring together music, visual interpretation, story telling, and to ice the cake get the viewer involved and immersed. If that isn't art then art sucks.

  • "If it isn't art, then art sucks."

    Hahaha, you tell em' bro.

Comment on the Smart Living Network

Site Feedback